Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am by lawmrh
But the clip nevertheless underscores the problem with objectified intolerance. _____________________________________________________________ (1) Prior to a post-conviction evidentiary hearing in State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
The static risk factors coded in the current study accounted for considerable variance in recidivism and could easily be used to improve statistical controls in future evaluations. ..more.. by Hanson, R. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Furthermore, the reporting of the baseline Rule G-32 information for such transactions alerts investors in other securities of the issuer to the existence of issuer debt that might be on a parity with, or senior to, their own holdings (emphasis added). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Not only was it reasonable for the employer’s attorney to believe the employee’s former counsel had authority to settle the case on his behalf, the parties explicitly agreed that the oral settlement was an immediately enforceable and binding contract (Galanis v The Harmonie Club of the City of New York, October 2, 2014, Woods, G). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]