Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 51,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
In Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 12:04 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
STERN v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
The case of the day, Baldiga v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
“Given the human capacity for mischief in all its forms the Policy sensibly takes an open-ended approach to bad faith, listing some examples without attempting to exhaustively enumerate all its varieties,” Worldcom Exchange, Inc v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
“Given the human capacity for mischief in all its forms the Policy sensibly takes an open-ended approach to bad faith, listing some examples without attempting to exhaustively enumerate all its varieties,” Worldcom Exchange, Inc v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:30 am
What this has given rights holders is, arguably, a weapon, which allows them to take down material on a whim with very little or no regard to its actual use or purpose. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:36 am
However in Spencer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:35 pm
A spokesman says the 3,000 number referred to the “universe of trackers” — and may reflect the total used over a given year, or the total in use at any one time, or someone’s dartboard score. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:43 am
Mondis Technology Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 1:22 pm
The reassurances given were just as continuous, numerous, and specific. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:51 pm
Even if you are not using the boat’s motor at the time of the test, if the boat has a motor, you can be given a BUI. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:42 am
In the decision in Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft v Generic Health Pty Ltd (No 2), issued earlier this month, Justice Jagot concluded that Dr Rowe’s evidence was inconsistent with the evidence he had given in his 1998 affidavits in the omeprazole case, and that this tended ‘to undermine the weight which would otherwise be given to [his] evidence’. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Occupy Tucson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
Cir. 2001).As to obviousness:At the crux of these arguments, is a dispute as to whether one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use a third-party to guarantee against the risk of non-payment in card-not-present transactions, given the teachings of the prior art. (...)Given this, we agree with the Examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use a third-party guarantor of card-present transactions in a… [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
In Vicente Lazo v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Statutory violation: Given the statutory inapplicability, the court’s remaining discussion about the statute seems like dicta. [read post]
