Search for: "United States v. John" Results 3621 - 3640 of 11,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
The president has “plenary and exclusive power … as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” the Supreme Court noted more than 80 years ago in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
Congress decided that not every person who wishes to enter into the United States gets to do so at will. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
That provision empowers the president to deny entry to foreign nationals when entry would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
§1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Hilary Hurd, Yishai Schwartz
The provision empowers the president to “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” if he “finds” that entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:40 am
United States -- a decision that affirmed the United States government's relocation of citizens of Japanese dissent to internment camps during World War II. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:19 am by Scott Bomboy
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:50 am by Ilya Somin
Earlier today, a closely divided Supreme Court upheld President Donald Trump's policy barring most entry into the United States by citizens of five Muslim-majority nations. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]