Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 3641 - 3660 of 11,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2018, 6:06 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
A report (pdf) commissioned by the State Bar of California found what most of us recognize already. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Yesterday's decision using Murphy to invalidate Section 1373 follows a similar ruling by a federal district court in Philadephia, and also one in California concluding that "Section 1373 does just what Murphy proscribes," in a case involving a Trump administration challenge to California's "sanctuary state" laws. [read post]
Oracle, the California Supreme Court held that non-California residents working in California for a California-based employer were subject to California daily overtime laws if they performed their in-state work for whole days. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm by Monica Williamson
 AUSAs have the opportunity to represent the interests of the United States of America in the United States District Court of Arizona and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in performing this important public service, to exercise responsibility that is unparalleled in any other job that a litigator might undertake. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
One such occasion came a little over a year ago, when the justices refused to weigh in on a California law that, as a general rule, bars people from carrying guns in public. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
Walker is a law professor at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Addressing the case for a second time, the Ninth Circuit turned to California state court decisions to determine what constitutes a “restraint of substantial character” under Section 16600. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by Robert Wernli, Jr.
California-based Delaware corporations have successfully challenged the enforceability of CGCL Section 2115 in court. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.html Access to justice: Impact of Twombly & Iqbal on state court systems. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Native American Rights Fund
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.htmlAccess to justice: Impact of Twombly & Iqbal on state court systems. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm by Sophia Cope
The majority of the California Supreme Court agreed that the trial court’s removal order against Yelp was barred by Section 230. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
This list includes large states such as Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
In Kavanaugh’s view, qualified immunity plainly barred the suit. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
In Kavanaugh’s view, qualified immunity plainly barred the suit. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 2:45 pm by Francesca Blackard
  The husband argued the original order for summary judgment barred relitigation of the decree’s terms. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:23 pm by Monica Williamson
  Because California law governs certain of the water issues affecting the Tribe, only applicants who are licensed members in good standing of the California State Bar will be considered. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
” David Savage of Los Angeles Times reports that the “Supreme Court could have a conservative majority to strike down bans on semi-automatic weapons in California and other liberal states and to decree that law-abiding Americans have a right to carry a gun in public. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:11 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Oracle, the California Supreme Court held that non-California residents working in California for a California-based employer were subject to California daily overtime laws if they performed their in-state work for whole days. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 9:49 am by Jeffrey Carr
This is because California courts operate on the doctrine of pure comparative fault. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 5:07 pm by David Ruiz
The Kelsey Smith Act would effectively bar providers from protecting their users. [read post]