Search for: "Cross v. Cross" Results 3641 - 3660 of 21,872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2020, 1:06 am by CMS
Where cross-claims exist, enforcement might nonetheless be granted where the cross-claim is shown to be of no substance or it has been determined by the adjudicator as part of the same dispute. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
You’re representing a defendant in a domestic violence case, and comes time to cross-examine the alleged victim, you’re loaded for bear. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
These articles concern Judge Vaugn Walker's denial of a summary judgment motion in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm by Zachary Spilman
Of note, this case involved a cross-certification by the Judge Advocate General of the Army. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2015 07 06 Statement of Issues 2015 07 06 Underlying Decision in Case–Memorandum Opinion 2015 09 11 Appellant Brief 2015 11 18 Appellee Brief 2015 12 03 Fond du Lac Band Amicus for Appellee Brief Lower court briefs: 25 Duluth Motion for Summary J 26 US Cross Motion for Summary J 27-1 Fond du Lac Proposed Amicus Brief DCT order Denying NIGC Motion to Dismiss Federal Motion to Dismiss Duluth Opposition Federal Reply Complaint here. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(Forbes Cross-Post) California’s New Law Shows It’s Not Easy To Regulate Revenge Porn (Forbes Cross-Post) Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn — EC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Ronald Mann
The most recent case in this line of decisions was the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in American National Red Cross v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
 From her car.Without access to her appraisal (or the opposing expert's appraisal) or other documents in the case.The trial judge was not impressed, to say the least:"During cross-examination, Andreas’s counsel moved to exclude or strike Burke’s testimony and appraisal report “due to lack of preparation and lack of ability to testify in this matter. [read post]