Search for: "Florida v. United States"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 6,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 4:44 am
Kagan as Solicitor General for the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
Sexual abuse cases involving the Catholic Church are rampant across the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
Sarhan's sole remedy is to proceed by way of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, as per 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
FLORIDA ATLANTIC STOCK TRANSFER, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
Florida, 517 U. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States, wherein the university barred interracial dating due to their religious beliefs. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:52 am
United States, a capital case in which the federal government recently filed its brief in opposition after taking eleven extensions. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
In the 1982 Supreme Court case, Plyler v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:57 am
The settlement class of eligible employees includes all women employed as FAs or FA trainees in the United States, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
District Court did not Abuse its Discretion in Approving Class Action Settlement in Securities Fraud Class Action Filed in United States because Class Members with Claims in Canadian Class Actions were Provided Adequate Notice of the Right to Opt Out of the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:07 am
The United States Supreme Court rendered a notable opinion in January 2016. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
This is a new innovation in the United States, with only a few cases like Rio Props. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
See Weiss v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
§ 924(e)(2)(A)(ii) if, according to the Florida legislature, the state need not prove that the defendant “knew the illicit nature of the substance” he sold or possessed with intent to sell. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]