Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 3641 - 3660 of 5,731
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
To defeat this presumption, the non-debtor spouse will have to prove that he or she contributed more than 50% to the joint account. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:49 am by Sarah Tran
He argues that it could be justified only by evidence showing that those patent holders wishing to impose tying requirements would earn insufficient profits from the patented product to rationalize future investments. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Gina Durham
Proposed “.city” and “.country” TLDs could be relevant for clients who do business in those locations,” he said. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:59 am by Linda McClain
You may recall that when Eric Holder notified Congress in February 2011 that the DOJ would not defend DOMA in the Windsor lawsuit (and the other lawsuit now pending in federal district court tin Connecticut, Perdersen v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
56/11 Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main eG v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
56/11 Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main eG v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm by Jay Stanley
Specifically, he asked why, even though experts agree that the recent Supreme Court case US v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
” (Attorney General Eric Holder, April 11, 2012) “This was competition on the merits, with Apple providing a superior reading platform on a beautiful 10 inch iPad screen, with color, multi-media, and fixed display, and access to millions of future iPad purchasers. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:33 am by Lewis Lazarus
In 2003, the Delaware General Assembly extended the right to demand inspection from stockholders of record to beneficial stockholders, but only if the beneficial holder states under oath with the demand that he or she is a beneficial holder, provides documentary evidence of beneficial ownership of the stock and states that such evidence is a true and correct copy of what it purports to be.In Central Laborers Pension Fund v. [read post]