Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 6,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2013, 4:05 am
In In re Marriage of Sarah Peterson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Finchum v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:36 pm
By Daniel RichardsonWelch v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
Moore also signed deed conveying the property from himself to himself and his wife as tenants by the entirety, as his plan was for both of them to hold title jointly as husband and wife. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Hatfield v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm
Lester, 85 F.3d 1409 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that wife’s one-half interest in portion of community property was not liable to criminal forfeiture imposed on her husband). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
The recently decided Appellate Division matter of Scianni v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:29 am
In her decision of February 4, 2013 in Questel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:27 am
With respect to transfers between husband and wife, the law presumes they are not designed to avoid creditors. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
” However, as a result of DOMA, there is one significant exception, codified in 1996: “[f]or federal tax purposes, a marriage means only a legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” means a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
Supreme Court, March 27, 2013):Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) defines the term “marriage” for all purpose under federal law including the provision of federal benefits, as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” 1 USC 7. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
M.G. and D.D. were also husband and wife. . . . [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:26 am
Spall-Goldsmith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:25 am
Henshaw v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
Farnsworth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:14 pm
Last week, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mayfield v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In its February 20, 2013 decision in Cioffi-Petrakis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 5:38 pm
The wife's attorney asked the court, if necessary, to order the husband's attorney to disgorge amounts already paid to him. [read post]
