Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 3641 - 3660 of 4,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2010, 8:27 am by Lisa McElroy
  It’s interesting to note that an awful lot of people think that the Court is split five-to-four pretty much all of the time, with Justice Kennedy casting the deciding vote. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:14 am by Ronald Mann
  Webre’s argument was noteworthy for the best quip of the day, Scalia’s joking allusion to the indeterminacy of arising-under doctrine – “we’re making it up anyway, right? [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:51 am by Joy Waltemath
It’s even less, by the way, if you’re an African American or a Latina. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:42 pm by Frank Pasquale
Justices Kennedy and Scalia have called corporations “the voices that best represent the most significant segments of the economy,” but they also manage to do a great deal of damage. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:46 pm
Readers of a certain age will remember the collective shock and revulsion that the country felt when seeing John Kennedy murdered on the famous Zapruder film. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:16 am by Orin Kerr
I suppose it’s appropriate that this ruling comes in a case ultimately decided on mootness grounds: If you’re going to say that there is standing to challenge language in a ruling ultimately decided the other way on other grounds, there is no more appropriate place to do it than through language in a ruling ultimately decided the other way on other grounds.I find Justice Kennedy’s dissent (joined by Justice Thomas) persuasive:The rule against hearing appeals or… [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:54 am
Edward Kennedy 06/19/2007 Letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Chairmen of the FCC and FTC from 72 House Members (PDF 631 KB) Letter urges blocking the proposed merger between XM and Sirius Satellite 06/19/2007 Letter to Chairman and ranking member of the House Agriculture Committee from 26 Members of California's Congressional Delegation Letter requests the 2007 farm bill (H.R. 2419) address priorities to combat hunger and poverty in urban and suburban… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:06 am by Dennis Crouch
The 7-2 majority opinion was penned by Justice Breyer and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagen. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm by Jeff Foust
” Later in the hearing, she added, “In effect, you’re going to be below 2010. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm by Dave Wieneke
If you’re a relationship marketer, can you imagine a greater accomplishment than fans who will bankroll an enterprise they believe in? [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:28 am by Dan Bressler
” “…law firms should not re-assign lawyers to client matters to avoid notification or prevent a client from leaving, though it may be prudent to introduce new lawyers to a client in case a client does stay, in order to have some level of continuity. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
Kennedy to Use of Bogash, 301 U.S. 389, 393 (1937); Merrill Lynch & Co. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am by Steven Calabresi
Kennedy, and it was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Justice Samuel Alito all three of whom are still on the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:25 am by MBettman
  In a 5-2 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Fischer, DeWine, and DeGenaro and Twelfth District Court of Appeals Judge Michael E. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm by Douglas Berman
Not long after Breyer described his concerns and thinking, Justice Anthony Kennedy asked a question that was based on what he called “Justice Breyer’s common sense approach. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:48 am by Stephen Wermiel
Second, the city could re-impose regulations, although the change in New York State law makes that more difficult. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 8:23 am
Even if you possess all the skills to defend yourself, if you can't properly implement them in your daily life you're better off recognizing that fact. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:43 am
” Turns out they’re by some children advocacy groups worried that if the Supreme Court goes too far, it might throw out FCC’s ability to regulate television content altogether, and that means regulations prescribing how much children’s television shows the stations have to air. [read post]