Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 3641 - 3660
of 62,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
(People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 12:54 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:04 am
She is a talented writer and editor, and we’re excited to have her tackle this new role. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:08 am
Bedoya v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:36 am
In that setting, collateral estoppel of res judicata issues arise. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:02 am
Interesting example of how not to successfully apply for disclosure of information from the family court here, in Thames Valley Police v Ms F & Anor [2023] EWFC 28. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
From Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion yesterday in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
B.S.G. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Re, Personal Precedent at the Supreme Court, 136 Harv. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
The plan would conclude with the pair being pulled over as they re-entered the state. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Res. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:31 pm
See, In re Marriage of Earlywine (2013). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:00 pm
If errors are identified, the submitter will need to correct the file and re-submit. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
But, respectfully, you're not the last word on that one. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm
In re Ruschig, 379 F.2d 990, 994–95 (CCPA 1967); Fujikawa v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:02 pm
Most recently, in California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am
Housen v. [read post]
