Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Similarly, the European Court of Human Rights has previously refused to accept the UK government’s claim that journalists should receive a higher level of protection under Article 10 (freedom of expression) than non-journalists (Steel and Morris v UK [2005] EMLR 15, [89]). does not mean that popular reactions to criminal activity should receive absolute protection from state interference. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
Surveillance and Information Gathering MPs discussed and voted on the Investigatory Powers Bill last week in the report stage of the Bill’s progression through Parliament, the third vote before the Bill was sent to the House of Lords. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
(I’m very pleased to welcome Antoine Dusséaux from Doctrine as a guest contributor on this post. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
To cut to the chase (and omit the first hundred or so paragraphs), following Lord Kerr in A v Essex County Council (National Autistic Society intervening) [2011] AC 280; [2010] UKSC 33 the High Court found that a failure to take steps to provide education when the state authority responsible for providing it is aware of the absence of the pupil from any form of education could in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the right. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
See Matal v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
This is an undesirable state of affairs for the reasons given at paragraph 6 of my earlier Memorandum. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
United KingdomMeechan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
In response to the dramatic expansion of the Spanish Crown during Emperor Charles V’s reign, elites in the court and the Emperor himself typically employed inspections as a means of collecting records and reports. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
To get one, a federal agent, with (Lord help us, hopefully) a federal prosecutor assisting, drafts an affidavit explaining the facts supplying probable cause for the federal charges sought. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:34 am
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
The Human Rights Convention, in requiring that states ensure respect for family life, protects first and foremost the rights of the child. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
On the moment the news broke about Roe v. [read post]
