Search for: "People v Word"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 17,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 6:39 am
Today in the Community we continue our discussion of FCC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Habush v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:32 pm
In Gemstone Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
In other words: it confers civil rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
It’s a case called Minarsky v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
It’s a case called Minarsky v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Justices ask about the wording of the 2011 AV Referendum Act and Chambers QC confirms that he will provide the relevant provision which shows the different wording used, which confirms that Parliament is handing over its sovereignty (in contrast to that used in the 2015 Act). 14:17: Dominic Chambers QC reiterates that the 2015 Act contained no requirement for the UK government to implement the result or set a timeline in relation to the referendum. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm
Wyoming Law) and I examine the decision in a new article, Errors of Omission: Words Missing from the Ninth Circuit's Young v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
TM clerk was very different from patent counterparts—technical expertise v. experts in delicate art of distinguishing and classifying signs and words. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 3:13 am
Today the Smith v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:24 am
In Minor v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:50 pm
"] From yesterday's pseudonymized decision in Kareem K. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:03 pm
Lochner v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
Owens, and Jesinoski v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:30 am
This may confuse people in and outside of the UK. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:37 am
If Smith v. [read post]
