Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY" Results 3641 - 3660 of 7,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
Tom F. nondecision by the United States Supreme Court last October. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:49 pm by Holly Doremus
(To the extent that Justice Kennedy deserves his reputation for sensitivity to the views of the states, note that 31 states have signed on to an amicus brief in support of petitioners and of course Oregon is a petitioner.) [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Kennedy, of Harvard Law School; and Michael K. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:15 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Judge Pryor has left no doubt where he stands on abortion, calling Roe -v- Wade, "the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Matthew Scarola
The Court granted certiorari in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:30 am by Mark Walsh
The other is that the second case for argument today is Lorenzo v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:10 pm
  Back in 2006, the 5th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am by Howard Knopf
(Counsel in black robes preparing for Supreme Court oral argument - with apologies to the IPKat)All eyes will be on the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) on Monday, October 29, 2012 when it will hear oral argument in the immensely important case of  Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:06 am by Richard Renner
S. 164, 168 (2008) (search incident to an arrest that was illegal under state law was reasonable); California v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:49 pm
  Legal experts say the man, Patrick Kennedy, is the only inmate on death row in the United States who was not convicted of committing or participating in a killing. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]