Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 8:36 am
Verrilli, Jr] urgently sought to be reaffirmed — is Abood v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, 174 U. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas, Scalia wrote: “With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are ‘contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:21 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
” For that part of its ruling, the state court majority relied in part upon a comment the Supreme Court had made in its controversial campaign finance decision last year in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:51 pm
, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
United States, that upheld this horrendous program implemented by the F.D.R. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
Roberts also observed in Gill that the Supreme Court looked at this issue in 2006 in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Once again, preferences and politics, not law, were the coins of the realm at the United States Supreme Court.Despite the conservative justices' rhetorical embrace of public meaning originalism, the reality is that constitutional litigation almost always involves the balancing of important and conflicting values. 303 Creative v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Here I'll say a word about three odd-numbered amendments, which I'll take in reverse order.Eleventh Amendment: By its terms, the Eleventh Amendment bars suits "against one of the United States by citizens of another state," but in 1890 in Hans v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
