Search for: "Banks v. US"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 14,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 3:05 am
"Personal jurisdiction can be conferred under CPLR 302(a)(1) "even though the defendant never enters New York, so long as the defendant's activities here were purposeful and there is a substantial relationship between the transaction and the claim asserted" (Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc. v Montana Bd. of Invs., 7 NY3d 65, 71, cert denied 549 US 1095; see Fischbarg v Doucet, 9 NY3d 375, 380). [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:42 am
In Miller v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am
Using reasoning drawn from a previous case on the SDLT subsale provisions (HMRC v DV3 RS LP [2013] EWCA Civ 907), the court determined that the presence of the subsale meant that the SDLT exemption for Sharia transactions could not apply. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
This time, in Cuomo v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
The subject of Norman's guest post here is the recent US decision in CLS Bank Int’l v Alice Corp 2011-1301 (Fed Cir 2013) en banc aff’g 768 F Supp 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2011). [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:46 pm
Bank of Detroit v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:56 pm
Bank N.A.; No. 3:17-cv-00481 (W.D.N.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:35 am
Carnbroe purchased the Property using finance from the Bank of Scotland plc (“BOS”). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:48 am
CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208 (2014). [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:19 am
SEC v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Altria Group v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
Nov 08, 2007) (NO. 1934)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
Greenwood (US SUpreme Court 01/10/2012). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:35 am
Wayfair, and Pereira v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am
A “hospital expenses agreement” used to justify the most substantial payments had never been mentioned before. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:47 am
In Flores-Aldape v Kamash, 2016 WL 4430835 (N.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
In the recent case of Jeffery v. [read post]
