Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 34,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 12:17 pm
Under a California Supreme Court decision in Robins v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 11:12 am
In Crest v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:40 am
Facts: This case (Utne v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am
Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum, and Kevin Tobia In Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
” Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 12:25 pm
See Horne v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
I'd limit it to situations like this one in which the federal appellate court for the relevant geographic area (here, California) has finally and conclusively held a statute to violate federal law, including but not limited to the Constitution. [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:58 am
Federal courts blocked these laws. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Smith's speech on the Platform Law Blog and would also like to see other players "[e]mbrac[e] rather than fight[] digital regulation. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:06 pm
In 2019, California enacted AB 539 which, effective January 1, 2020, limited the interest rate that can be charged on loans less than $10,000 but more than $2,500 by lenders licensed under the California Financing Law (CFL) to 36% plus the federal funds rate. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm
In Crest v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:16 pm
From Aristocrat Plastic Surgery, P.C. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
California lawmakers are also considering a measure to shield those who help a pregnant person travel to the Golden State for an abortion from getting sued. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:00 am
The case is Hanagami v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
Table 1: Revenue Impact of Federal Flavor Ban State Menthol cigarettes share of market Excise tax rate per pack of 20 cigarettes Total revenue decline Excise tax decline as percentage of total decline Alabama 42% $0.675 -$83,087,724 36% Alaska 24% $2.00 -$7,403,636 62% Arizona 26% $2.00 -$60,425,192 53% Arkansas 33% $1.15 -$52,609,248 44% California 27% $2.87 -$328,526,977 63% Colorado 24% $1.94 -$46,266,930 39% Connecticut 43% $4.35 -$80,529,512 78% Delaware 51% $2.10 -$30,932,062… [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:00 am
Gross v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
