Search for: "Doe 35" Results 3661 - 3680 of 17,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal this week, but that does not mean the end to this legal challenge. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 12:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For the foregoing reasons, wevacate and remand the district court’s judgment of invalidity as to claims 7, 12, 35, 37 and 58 of the ’533 patent, claims 18, 34 and 55 of the ’125 patent, claims 5 and 34 ofthe ’357 patent and claims 1 and 22 of the ’842 patent. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 8:09 am by Dan Harris
On January 19, 2020, a 35-year-old man who had just come from China was diagnosed in suburban Seattle with the coronavirus. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Visalia (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 408, 416, 418 [NOE filed 5 days prior to any arguable project approval held ineffective to trigger 35-day statute of limitations].) [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 9:47 am by Kevin Kaufman
Beginning in tax year 2020, the state exempts 35 percent of benefits. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Lower Capital Allowances Lead to Slower Economic Growth Any cost recovery system that does not allow the full write-off of an investment—full expensing—in the year the investment is made denies recovery of a part of that investment, inflates the taxable income, and increases the taxes paid by businesses.[7] Lower capital allowances increase the cost of capital, which leads to slower investment and a reduction of the capital stock, reducing productivity, employment, and wages.[8]… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Rena Steinzor
And EPA does not declare itself open to using federal resources to mitigate such hazards. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 1:30 pm by Rankings
Americans are inundated by the minute with updates regarding the novel coronavirus- COVID-19. [read post]
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
Allegations against the doctors: 35 USC 287(c) immunizes “a medical practitioner’s performance of a medical activity” from being charged with infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(a) or (b). [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The State also points out that, under its interpretation of the Director's Order, the TRO does not maintain the status quo, but disrupts it. [read post]
Apple Inc., et al., the same court dismissed a claim for enhanced damages on the grounds that, even if the defendant Motorola had the alleged policy of not reviewing third party patents, such a policy “does not per-se constitute ‘willful blindness. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 6:49 am by Neil Wilkof
But it does not seem to have quite worked out that way. [read post]