Search for: "Doe I " Results 3661 - 3680 of 259,147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2013, 1:48 pm
Last, customers should be aware that if (i) a vendor repays or credits a customer after filing an abatement application and (ii) the government's refund to the vendor is delinquent, then the customer is entitled to any interest earned from the government. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
The memorial’s design stemmed from the context of World War I. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 2:43 pm by Richard Symmes
  If your case does not have a case number, you still must respond to the complaint to avoid a default judgment being entered against you. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:54 am by Matt Osenga
  The rule does not provide any detriment to the office or benefit to the applicant if the PTO does not meet this goal; i.e., there is no refund. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Q: If my wife and I file as married filing separately, will that make us less likely to get hit by the AMT? [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:45 pm
The list of opinions with atrocious & muddled reasoning on the other hand...Musing 2.1: Why does the Ninth Circuit at times underwhelm? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 11:19 am by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
This post discusses a common follow-up question: if I have decided to contest my D.U.I. charge and I’m not going to represent myself, how do I choose a D.U.I. attorney? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:57 am by Buce
Best thing I've read all day, except why does he call it an American plutocracy? [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Back in August, I blogged about a case where a federal court held that an employer inquiring about an employee's retirement plans, alone, does not discriminate on the basis of age. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 2:48 pm
  It seems hard to believe that with the popularity of this once acceptable practice the ASU Law Library doesn’t  own any of these specimens, or does it? [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by admin
  While it does not offer any proof regarding whether the defendant was aware of the condition prior to the plaintiff’s earlier accident, it is evidence that the condition that caused the plaintiff’s injury was dangerous. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:01 am by admin
  Because the law generally does not allow an injured person to “double dip” when seeking compensation for injuries, an injured person cannot receive payments for lost wages that have already been replaced by another party. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:01 pm by Dana
Shultz, Attorney at Law  +1 510 547-0545  dana [at] danashultz [dot] comThis blog does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
I recently came across Judge William Alsup's ruling in Carbon Crest, LLC v. [read post]