Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 3661 - 3680 of 5,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
Most of the respondents came from the SDIPLA and the Silicon Valley Intellectual Property Lawyers Association, 41 and 39 respectively. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:38 am by Ray Mullman
The earnings guidance does not reflect any other reimbursement changes or acquisitions, nor does it include any divestitures or repurchases of common stock. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That is, we might accept that there is an IGF-1 difference, but that’s not what the producers want to advertise. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., a suspension, of budesonide is administered by nebulization,” ’603 Patent col.1 ll.29- 31, and explains a few sentences later that “[t]he drug can be provided as an aqueous suspension in which the budesonide is suspended in a solvent,” id. col.1 ll.37-39. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Colin Murray
     With this role in mind, Kearns P simply read a reasonableness requirement into the provisions of electoral law, asserting that the courts would “read section 39(2) of the Electoral Act, 1992 as being subject to the requirement that the writ be moved within a reasonable time does no violence to the express wording of the sub-section”. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm by Ray Mullman
Below is the list of the Top 40 nursing home blogs: 1. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by Stefanie Levine
”[1]  This requirement, also known as the best mode requirement, is in essence a quid pro quo with the inventor. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm by IP Dragon
Li started juxtaposing research that proves that patents work to research that proves it does not. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Art 8 does not have a presumptive priority over Art 6 and open justice. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
At [51]-[52] the Court reiterated what it had said in Die BergSpechte at [38]-[39]. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am by The Legal Blog
About this writ in 1762 Lord Mansfield observed that ‘within the past century it had been liberally interposed for the benefit of the subject and advancement of justice’.39. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm by Jonathan Bailey
., favor larger copyright entities and not the little guys.1. [read post]