Search for: "House of Congress Employment" Results 3661 - 3680 of 5,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2022, 6:50 pm
A Committee Expert welcomed that the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China had ruled that married same sex couples should be allowed to apply for public housing. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
This is very different from the employment situations contemplated by ENDA. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am by Roger Clegg
This has always been a tricky business, and even trickier now after his surprising decisions the last two years in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:34 pm by Emily Dai
Wednesday, November 3, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.: The House Homeland Security Committee will hold a hearing on evolving the U.S. approach to cybersecurity. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats and White House Reach Deal Over Testimony by Ex-Trump Aide New York Times – Charlie Savage | Published: 5/11/2021 The Biden administration and House Democrats have reached a tentative deal to allow Donald Trump’s former White House counsel, Don McGahn, to testify before Congress about Trump’s efforts to obstruct the Russia inquiry. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
From the First Amendment to RFRA RFRA was enacted in 1993 with nearly unanimous bipartisan support in Congress in response to the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in Employment Division v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:55 pm by William Ford, Matt Gluck
  Thursday, May 13, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.: The House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Department of Homeland Security will hold a hearing on U.S. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:06 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
About the Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: ERISA & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
" That could be read, if one is interpreting the words "any other" in the abstract, as covering "all [employment] contracts within the Congress' commerce power,"[8] or at least any workers engaged more directly in foreign or interstate commerce, such as workers at hotels, people who do telephone sales, and the like. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
” Statutes prohibiting similar communications (including as to race, religion, and sex, and as to employment and housing as well as public accommodations) are common, and generally thought to be constitutional. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:40 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Others, such as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI), who crafted the plan, clearly disagree. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:59 am
Supreme Court had first approved the disparate impact theory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employment discrimination statute whose language lends itself to the interpretation that Congress intended to prohibit facially neutral policies that have the effect of discriminating. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:51 am by Joy Waltemath
“We ask Congress to do its part by passing the Paycheck Fairness Act, and we identify the major steps we must take to close the pay gap once and for all. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Congress intended antitrust law to address market efficiency, rather than racism. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:34 am by Robin E. Shea
 I was told that an employer in the 1990's "encouraged" all of its employees at a manufacturing facility in the United States to write letters to Congress encouraging the enactment of the North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA"). [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:00 pm
, Utility Consumers' Action, Network Western Center on Law and Poverty, and the Women's Employment Rights Clinic. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
In addition, the South Carolina House of Representatives passed a bill banning abortions after six weeks. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Plaintiffs lawyers are leading the offensive, and they view employers as the enemy. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:18 am by Scott Riddle
” The Palmer II district court emphasized that the fact that the employer did not require the debtor to obtain the degree or that it did not benefit the employer in some demonstrable way is “irrelevant as to whether Mr. [read post]