Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 3661 - 3680 of 182,375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 7:05 am
  But the dissenters on the court said the ruling lets the Rooses get away with "burying their heads in the sand" about their son's criminal behavior. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:20 am
The Institute for Justice, the nation’s leading libertarian public interest law firm, is seeking a staff attorney to join its merry band of litigators in its Arlington, Va. headquarters. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:27 am
And I think it happens when you don't have an answer or you don't have an answer that you want to give.So Kerry's endorsement of Biden is interesting because maybe the 2 men are a lot alike, and maybe — if Biden is the Democrats' nominee — he will fail to connect in much the same way. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm by Joe Mullin
Taking a second look at patents is in the public interest. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:14 am by PunditMom
  If there’s one thing I know for sure in the world of the Bush’s, it’s that you don’t mess with George and Jebbie’s mom! [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:32 am by South Florida Lawyers
He's a schmartie, that Judge Cope (pictured above).Back in 2009 he realized that it's pretty stupid that a trial court can't reserve on prejudgment interest, like it can on attorney's fees, and if it does the whole darn question of prejudgment interest will be waived if an appeal is taken.So he and the 3d suggested -- very politely of course -- that maybe kinda oughta you know the Supremes should perhaps revisit the issue, and… [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:39 am by Beth Hutchens
Yeah, I don’t think so, but let’s explore, because Prince does make an interesting point and he’s kind of right to be miffed, even if it’s for the wrong reasons. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 2:00 pm
That's the gist of this lengthy, extremely interesting, thoroughly researched special report. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Very interesting that he didn’t see any problem with granting plaintiffs practical monopolies over particular products—that’s not his problem. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bartell acknowledges that the district court's interest in restricting his speech to ensure a fair trial is reasonable. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 8:36 am by Russell Jackson
Guilford just issued an interesting opinion dismissing claims under California's Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
For the month of March, I am going to highlight blogs that I think are interesting and useful. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:35 am by Kristin Bergman
Still, Verizon's latest case and public debate may shed light on the liberties at stake with the net neutrality rules and how to best balance everyone's interests. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:35 am by Joseph Fields
Well, it’s official, same-sex married couples seeking divorces in Florida can’t yet do that. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
Don't tell us it's o.k. so long as you break them the way City Hall likes them broken. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:46 pm by Richard M. Re
The crux of Michael’s post is an interesting question: why did Hobby Lobby first conclude that a potentially game-changing argument wasn’t presented, before going on to explain why the argument wasn’t persuasive in any event? [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 8:44 pm
It's interesting how those remarks didn't make it into his ad. [read post]