Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 9,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 7:31 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
No one should be foolish enough to say that the criminal justice system is beyond improvement...But the matter has to be kept in perspective. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:54 am
In "After Dallas, the Future of Black Lives Matter," in The New Yorker, Jelani Cobb interviewing Alicia Garza, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter, asks about guns: "Does Black Lives Matter have a position on that? [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 11:32 am
Americans here in the U.S. are familiar with the names Freddie Gray, Michael Brown, and Sandra Brown who all died during or after confrontations with the police. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 6:28 pm
Even after the Department of Justice’s 85 page investigative report revealed that Michael Brown spoke no such words before he was shot in self-defence by a Ferguson police officer, Black Lives Matter, assisted by the far left media, continued to promulgate the lie that Michael Brown, allegedly a gentle giant, was shot in the back as he was surrendering to police. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:54 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Board of Education, with almost no desegregation having occurred during the fifteen years that followed Brown. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 6:53 am
Brown, said the gunman who was killed had “said he was upset at Black Lives Matter, said he was upset about the recent police shootings. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:51 am
This was, according to Dallas Police Chief David Brown, a coordinated effort by four shooters. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
[or] tell us what to do with it or what inferences should be gathered from it…”); Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
The Supreme Court then noted that adefendant's right to discovery in a criminal case is statutory rather than constitutional (see Matter of Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
Hellerstedt, in which the Court struck down two provisions of a Texas law regulating abortions, comes from Linda Hirshman, who in The Washington Post contends that the Court also “issued a decision on a matter fundamental to the national political divide”: “In a nation of laws, the Supreme Court held, you cannot have your own facts. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:49 am
Additionally, the appeals court disagreed with the employer’s contention that the district court’s jury instructions on this issue were inconsistent with federal regulations and Seventh Circuit precedent (Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
“Posting information on the Internet — whatever the subject matter — can constitute speech as surely as stapling flyers to bulletin boards or distributing pamphlets to passersby — activities long protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 10:24 am
Ricky Brown. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 3:11 pm
Rightly or wrongly, the belief is widely held by the practicing profession that this Court no longer respects impersonal rules of law but is guided in these matters by personal impressions which from time to time may be shared by a majority of Justices. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
Sullivan is involved in any number of high-profile cases, including the matter of Hillary Clinton’s State Department e-mails, so worlds are colliding. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court of North Carolina: State of North Carolina v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 9:48 am
Honest mistakes on matters of public concern are often constitutionally protected, especially against criminal punishment. [read post]
