Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
” Id. at 16 n.5. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Supp. 2d 1 (D. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
Williams Enterprises, Inc., 876 F.2d 186, 188 n.2 (D.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Ass’n, 131 S. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:38 pm
P. 68(d). [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Poulter, “Reference Guide on Medical Testimony,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 439, 476 & n. 136 (2d ed. 2000). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Dormant and unmonopolisable therapies: what’s the matter? [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:48 pm
The prior user’s name or identity is of sufficient fame or reputation that a connection with such person would be presumed when applicant’s mark is used on applicant’s goods.Section 2(a) claims are not barred by the five-year statute of limitations of Section 14 of the Act, and therefore a cancellation petitioner will sometimes resort to a Section 2(a) claim when a Section 2(d) claim is already time-barred.Section 2(a) False Connection… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Supp. 2d 986, 992 (D. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am
On January 29, 2010, Tyler moved for reconsideration [of the judge’s ruling]. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:44 am
D. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 2:20 pm
’s motion to stay in a case referred to Judge Burke for resolution of all pretrial matters. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:59 am
No. 12-457-RGA-CJB (D. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
” Id. at 241 n.2. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
It’s a valid point though. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:00 am
L’infraction criminelle est généralement constituée d’un acte prohibé (l’actus reus) et de l’élément de faute requis (la mens rea). [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:12 am
The gist of the ruling is to affirm the district court’s conclusion that, as a matter of fact, Warafi wasn’t a medic. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
The court rejected the agency argument: Rule 801(d)(2)(D) requires . . . agency. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:04 pm
In Matter of Martinez-Espinoza, 25 I & N Dec. 118 (BIA 2009), the BIA held that a 212(h) waiver may be sought for a drug paraphernalia conviction that relates to a single offense of simple possession of marijuana. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:55 pm
” Since “[n]othing in defendant’s motion to dismiss or the record before the trial court raised any factual dispute or suggestion that the delays . . . were attributable to any cause other than routine pretrial proceedings, or that the State had failed to prosecute the matter with diligence,” the 560-day delay was not “presumptively prejudicial. [read post]
