Search for: "People v. Johns" Results 3661 - 3680 of 7,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
The people do not elect the heads of agencies, but they do elect the president. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:06 pm
After quoting patent attorney John R. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
 I have quoted many times what I believe to be the late John Roche's useful addendum to Lord Acton's famous comment about power and corruption. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew Guariglia
Supreme Court decided a landmark case on this subject, Carpenter v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
When the authorities are allowed to get away with such things, the people who pay most sharply are the people who are out in the streets, trying to push their country to become a better, more just place. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 10:42 am by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  Real parties Henry Ruhnke, Thomas John McDowell and Victoria Knight McDowell Charitable Remainder Unitrust, and Thomas John McDowell and Victoria Knight McDowell, trustees, filed their application for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the project in 2021. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:59 am by JB
These are both appropriate answers.However, let me add a third answer.The power to regulate, as Chief Justice John Marshall said in Gibbons v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 9:16 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Similarly, when the US Supreme Court took up the issue of whether Colorado could keep Trump off the primary ballot under the Insurrection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, nominal liberals were all over the place offering pearl-clutching arguments about the sanctity of the vote, with one saying that Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:03 am
  Regardless of whether we elect John McCain or Barack Obama, my hope is that we can get someone who actually knows a thing...Patent SOS: Inequitable Conduct Reform ASAPNot long ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]