Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 6,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2012, 3:00 am
Gucci v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 8:28 am
This case, Jablonski v Rapalje, involves sellers that may have hid from a buyer the fact that the house in question was bat infested. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
The seller also relied on the First Department’s 2008 decision in Vick v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
Counsel for the defendant adds:ICE: Artifacts seized in US v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
For example, in the recent case, Durden v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:48 pm
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:42 pm
Institutional banks and lenders often cite GMAC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
Pappas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:55 am
Evans v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
George v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 10:37 am
Congress should address the issue and amend the Copyright Act to allow publishers to go after re-sellers but make exceptions for importation of copyrighted material which is done for personal use. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am
But what’s become a boom for growers and sellers is causing a headache for many city regulators. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
Second, it altered the standard the CARP must apply when determining royalty rates for these compulsory licenses — instead of the §802(b)(1) standard, CARP would “establish rates and terms that most clearly represent the rates and terms that would have been negotiated in the marketplace between a willing buyer and a willing seller” (the “willing buyer/willing seller” standard). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:35 am
In Hoover v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:19 pm
See Hilgers-Luckey v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See Garcia v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Feb. 2, 2012) (“argument[s] that the hospital is a product seller would have profound negative impact upon the services provided by a hospital to members of the public”; “the hospital is not selling the product but is offering the service”); Lambert v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 8:29 am
U.S.A. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Federal prosecutors on Friday filed a motion to amend their forfeiture complaint in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:26 am
The Bridgeport Superior Court’s decision is arguably a departure from the precedent established inBurkert v. [read post]
