Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3661 - 3680
of 15,301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
However, he agreed with the challenge based on the marks' inherent distinctiveness under s 3(1)(b), holding that they failed to meet the criteria in Case C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM [the 'Vorsprung durch Technik' case, noted by the IPKat here] in that they lacked originality, did not require any interpretation by the relevant public and were not indicative of a particular undertaking. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:49 am
Today, the International Court of Justice issued its order on Georgia's request for the indication of provisional measures in the case concerning Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
For the reasons stated in Justice Kagan's Rucho dissent, I strongly disagree with part (c), but the crucial point for now is (b): there is such a thing as excessive partisan gerrymandering.And that brings us back to Alexander. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
R. 10(c)). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:04 am
Martinson ***Editor's Note - This is an article written by M&B attorney Doug Martinson, Sr., in 1982 following the 1982 Alabama v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:17 am
The sibling patent’sindependent claim 1 is drawn to a method of sealing apuncture in a wall of a blood vessel involving neither aguidewire nor a dilator (i.e., a claim directed to Group II,but not limited to any of Species A, B, or C). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
V., Cotter, S. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
This comes directly from Paragraph 14(b)(1) and Paragraph 14(c)(2) of Appendix IX-A to Rule 5:6A. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
HSBC BANK USA, N.A. v CRUM No. 3:14-CV-3522-B USDC Tex. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
After a thorough review of Virginia law, the Court agreed with White Oak and stated: [c]ourts applying Virginia law must consider the actual damages contemplated at the time of contract when determining the reasonableness of a liquidated damages provision. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:36 am
§ 1692k(c). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
In effect, Design Furnishings had to seek protection from the courts because (a) Zen Path has taken a very aggressive copyright position, (b) eBay refused to mediate Zen Path's NOCIs, and (c) eBay's refusal to mediate meant that Design Furnishings could be kicked off the eBay network, even for listings that had nothing to do with this dispute. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
The forum selection clause stated, in bolded, all capital letters, that: Franchisee and its owners agree that Link may institute any action against Franchisee or its owners in any state or federal court of general jurisdiction in (a) the State of Texas, or (b) in the state where Franchisee has its principal place of business, or (c) within such state and in the judicial district in which Link has its principal place of… [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
Brian CorderyBristowsby Steven Willis Yesterday, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA Civ 1089, a dispute involving SOVALDI® (sofosbuvir), which is sold by Gilead as a treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in adults. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
§ 301(c). [read post]
