Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 27,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 1:42 pm
People v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
That is the crux of the question in Comptroller v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:15 am
Today, in Westphal v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:35 pm
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
The Labor Department’s (DOL) interpretation of Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) “outside sales exemption” from overtime pay, and related regulations, is the focus of Christopher v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
Tocomport with due process, the out-of-state defendant musthave “minimum contacts” with the forum State “such thatthe maintenance of the suit does not offend traditionalnotions of fair play and substantial justice. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
There is a 1995 federal case, Knapp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:38 am
It is a fair tactic. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Public Disclosure Commission v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
The lawsuits (States of Nevada, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:33 am
In Ferguson v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:48 am
In Moustakis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 10:58 am
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. [read post]
