Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 3661 - 3680
of 29,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2016, 8:02 pm
Benhaim v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
In the High Court, Warby J decided that the iPhone users did not have the same interest because they would have suffered different levels of damage, including possibly no damage at all. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
Feb. 10, 2011), and United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm
Case law on the reporting on alleged irregularities in the conduct of State officials (Zakharov v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:42 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 10:05 am
The trial court erred in calculating the defendant’s prior record level by using a joinable offense as a prior conviction State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:03 am
" Blum v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:23 am
The case is entitled Nevada et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
That ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:51 am
Level 3 Commc’ns, LLC, et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
In several states, courts either explicitly acknowledge a mandate of efficiency or the state constitution itself includes it. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
JD (Congo) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327 The Court of Appeal has considered the test for the second stage of appeal in immigration cases, when someone wishes to appeal from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel or the intermediate standard set by Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. [read post]
