Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 29,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Nealon’s Decision in the case of Locker v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
Does Data Scraping Violate Federal and State Law? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
In Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
The carport at issue is one that's familiar to anyone who's lived in cheaper apartments in our Great State: the carports consist of a line of open-ended stalls on the first floor of the apartment complex easily accessible to the street. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Va. 1985); andthe Lundberg test recently adopted by the Kansas Court of Appeals, which unifies these two approaches (State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Part V will consider the meaning of the phrase "office . . . under the United States," which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:35 am
In DeCook v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:01 am
Just as in Stolman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:38 am
"
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:46 am
(reported here) and Thomas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
The Supreme Court held in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
In West v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:22 pm
Tax Court addressed in LaFlamme v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
Any future plans that the parents may have are irrelevant to our inquiry. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
In McKimmy v Melling, the Court of Appeals held that when ruling on a change of domicile motion, a trial court should consider whether a proposed parenting time schedule provides “a realistic opportunity to preserve and foster the parental relationship” and not whether the proposed schedule would be the best plan. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
See Mozes v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:44 am
The majority Appeals Court explains that these consolidated appeals focus on a Clean Air Act visible emissions regulation promulgated by the State of Alabama and submitted to EPA as a revision to Alabama's State Implementation Plan (SIP). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
Brentwood Borough Council v Ball & Ors [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB) This was the hearing of an application for an injunction by Brentwood BC. [read post]
