Search for: "State v. Scales" Results 3661 - 3680 of 4,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 4:12 am by Florian Mueller
The most important smartphone IP ruling in the months ahead is going to be the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Oracle v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
”[6] In a policy statement from just a few years ago, the FTC agreed that mergers can promote innovation: [I]n dynamic sectors characterized by high R&D costs, firms with broad scale and scope may have unique incentives and capabilities to invest in innovation. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
” That is a high bar to scale, even when the prisoner is represented by counsel. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
But assuming it is possible to achieve reductions of this scale at an independent agency such as the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
Some actors representing but the minority on the international scale continue to advocate unilateral approaches to addressing international issues and resort to force; they interfere in the internal affairs of other states, infringing their legitimate rights and interests, and incite contradictions, differences and confrontation, thus hampering the development and progress of mankind, against … [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am by Dan Bressler
At least that’s what a Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey decided last week in Harish v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If we are going to have registration as an individualized determination at that scale, we are going to have inconsistencies. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
More surprising is the strong fair use rulings protecting the aggregation of copyrighted works into large-scale databases–the subject of several significant defense wins, including the Author’s Guild v. [read post]