Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 16,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 10:47 am
The recent Supreme Court ruling, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:07 pm
They asked why the IRS seems to be ignoring that 2010 decision—United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Cyan Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
In Stocker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:00 pm
And yet, at hundreds of state-level facilities, we have strong incentive to keep those jails and prisons filled with warm bodies. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm
In Turner v Rogers, the Court began from a premise it regarded as both legally significant and unquestionably true: that child support proceedings are civil. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:16 am
In my most recent post on the pending cell-phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:07 am
But the Third Circuit reversed, holding that the presumptive enforceability of choice-of-law clauses must yield to a strong public policy of the state where a suit is brought. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Town of Callicoon, 79 NY2d 907, the Court of Appeals ruled that a court could vacate an arbitrator’s award if it determines that the award violated a strong public policy. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:53 pm
Unfortunately, in 2013, the Supreme Court crippled one of the most effective protections of that act in its Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
A judge has clarified the circumstances in which summary convictions can be appealed in Alberta.In R v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:04 am
Yet another Second Circuit ruling reminds us how difficult is is to show that you suffered discrimination because other guys at work who also broke the rules were not punished.The case is Diggs v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:38 pm
One of the hackers is also charged with seeking to gain control of New York state infrastructure (U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am
Colorado, in which the justices held that a state cannot require a defendant whose conviction is invalidated to prove actual innocence before recovering fines and fees imposed as a consequence of the conviction, observing that with this decision, the “presumption of innocence, already strong in our criminal justice system, became a little stronger. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
Judge Trenga then applied the Mathews v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Initially, the NEB stated that they had met with former Quebec premier, Jean Charest, to seek his political advice. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Additionally, given the strong First Amendment protection for speech, which requires that actionable defamatory statements be made at least negligently (Gertz v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:06 am
* Jazz Photo v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
See, e.g., McCulloch v. [read post]
