Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
Sullum notes the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
" Simcox v.. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
Contrary to what Blackrock stated, the Court did not find any multiple meanings of the slogan, nor did Blackrock provide any. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
Concerning the UK decisions, the Hague Court of Appeal states (4.3): “Departing from the said criterion the Court of Appeal, other than the judge in summary proceedings and the English High Court and Court of Appeal, partly because of different insights (more in particular after reading of the priority document) and partly because of other arguments of parties…”.Now this is jolly interesting, thinks this moggy. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:08 pm
(I think that, even in the absence of the Free Exercise Clause that were made in that case, but that might be unavailable in many states following Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
The 7th amendment, believe it or not, does not apply in state courts. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
The People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
Meyer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
Richard Ortiz – well, less so.United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
This could be an interesting case - and reminds the CopyKat of the recent decision by Mr Justice Birss in Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & another [2012] EWPCC 1 where infringement was found, and the decision by a Korean appellate court that found that the 'recreation' of a photograph of a natural scene of pine trees on an island set against a skyline could not be infringement - although neither of those cases took 28… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
The original document is circulating only among senior CCP and university officials; a summary has appeared via Xinhua but remains unavailable in English (See here and below). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:09 am
Member States shall provide for authors, in respect of the original of their works or of copies thereof, the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any form of distribution to the public by sale or otherwise. 2. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
In Mosley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
Let’s talk about the argument in Plain English. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
"No image (rights) availableToday's judgmentKitchin LJ started his analysis by confirming what Birss J had stated in his judgment, ie that "[t]here is in English law no "image right" or "character right" which allows a celebrity to control the use of his or her name or image. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Eventually, the AG states that an anti-suit injunction cannot be qualified as a ground of non-recognition for a violation of public policy under article V (2)(b) NYC (paras 160 ff). [read post]
