Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 3681 - 3700 of 30,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 12:05 am by Isabel McArdle
AHK and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1117 (Admin) – Read judgment Secrecy and secret justice are rarely out of the public eye. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:24 pm by admin
Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that limit class action waivers in arbitration agreements (AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:00 pm
In late 2016, in its highly-watched decision in Salman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  Now the parties have agreed on the scope of a permanent injunction, and this week in Parker v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
The Fall 2024 lineup for the University of Pennsylvania Legal History Workshop is below:September 12th, 2024: Jonathan Gienapp (Stanford University), "The People of the United States: The Lost Constitution of National Popular Sovereignty"September 26th, 2024: Ofra Bloch (Tel Aviv University, Buchmann Faculty of Law), “Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court also stated that the penalty imposed, termination, was not so disproportionate to Employee’s offense as to shock its sense of fairness, explaining that the evidence established that Employer’s requirement that Employee participate in processing training was not in excess of its authority.In addition, the court mentioned that Employee had not observed the rule of "work now, grieve later" and that Employee had failed to show that any exceptions to the… [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In March 2021, the Court of Appeals said the State was denied a fair trial in a dispute over whether anti-abortion activists had unlawfully impeded women from an abortion clinic. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]