Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 3681 - 3700 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 10:50 am by Thomas Kaufman
Superior Court as establishing a rule that makes certification exceedingly difficult to obtain in the great majority of meal period class actions, Ms. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 4:30 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The California Supreme Court has granted review in Iskanian, which is expected to reconcile the application of Concepcion in the employment context. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
In honor of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent grant of an appeal on the Restatement (Second)/Restatement (Third) in Tincher v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
As Bob Ambrogi reports, on February 19, 2013, Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Peter Lauriat held a hearing in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Moderator
Are powers of attorney granted by a corporation made void when its legal representative is changed? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  In a similar case against State Farm, a California Superior Court judge has now certified a class. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:14 am by Steven G. Pearl
 I assume that the employer will petition for review and that the Supreme Court will grant and hold pending Sanchez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Pennsylvania Supreme Court thereafter dismissed the appeal in Bugosh as improvidently granted and, even later in 2012, reaffirms the Restatement (Second) in Beard v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 3:28 pm by Employment Lawyers
Brobston, Pennsylvania's Superior Court (the appeal court one step below the PA Supreme Court), the Court considered whether the employer could enforce a non-compete agreement against an employee it had terminated due to alleged poor performance. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am by The Charge
  That case is pending in the Supreme Judicial Court under the caption Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cordis Cordis Corporation appeals from the decision of theUnited States District Court for the Eastern District ofVirginia granting Abbott Laboratories’ motion to quashtwo subpoenas duces tecum issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:36 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall that, previously, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled on an identical venue selection clause in an insurance policy in the case of O’Hara v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:16 pm by Gustav L. Schmidt
Symantec Corp., a California superior court case, the courts in both instances denied granting injunctive relief to plaintiffs on the grounds that they had failed to establish that the law required more information to be disclosed in the proxy statement than what had been supplied. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Court granted defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the Sherman Act claims without leave to amend. [1] The Court did not address whatever effect Twombly and Iqbal may have on Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. [read post]