Search for: "Jones v. United States"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 3,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
United States), and I have earlier indicated my acceptance of that decision. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
Trina Jones Jerome M. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:31 pm
For example, consider the recent GPS surveillance case before the Supreme Court — United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
’s explanation for the coding of Wisconsin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Among other criticisms, Richardson states that when officers went to her house to retrieve her vehicle, she did not come to the door. [read post]
