Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 13,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) - the Federal Circuit held that the seizure as evidence was not a taking for public use because the seizure was an exercise of the government's "police power," and not an exercise of eminent domain. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:41 pm
Eventually, the Wynnes amended their petition to claim that the tax credit statute was in violation of the Commerce Clause of the United State Constitution. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:11 am
†See Rajah v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:54 pm
Geographic COVID-19 Restrictions The geographic COVID-19-related P.P.s 9984, 9992, and 10143, which suspend entry into the United States of foreign nationals who have been physically present in the People’s Republic of China, Islamic Republic of Iran, Schengen Area, United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, Brazil, and South Africa, in the 14-day period before seeking entry into the United States, continue to remain in effect. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:03 am
In an 8-0 decision[1] issued March 25, 2014 in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:12 pm
’s removal to the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 3:20 pm
In Montero-Garcia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:00 am
Finally, the New York Court of Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit essentially ignore all these considerations. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 10:40 am
At this time, however, the Government’s petition for a writ of mandamus does not have a “fair prospect” of success in this Court because adequate relief may be available in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm
United States Bureau of Reclamation (Rule 19, Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Eagle Bear, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Facts of Jennings v Rodriquez After a 2004 conviction, Alejandro Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen and a lawful permanent resident of the United States, was detained pursuant to §1226 while the Government sought to remove him. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (Federal Reserved Water Right - Groundwater)Petition for certiorari was filed on 11/20/17 in: Public Service Company of New Mexico v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (Federal Reserved Water Right - Groundwater)Petition for certiorari was filed on 11/20/17 in: Public Service Company of New Mexico v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 10:02 am
New York, 2024) the district court denied the Petition of Sebastien Funez Mene which sought the repatriation from the United States to Poland of the parties’ only child, a minor referred to herein as “BFS,” who is alleged to have been unlawfully removed from Poland by Respondent in early 2022. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
United States No. 08-876, Black v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 10:49 am
That case, NCAA v. [read post]
