Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 3681 - 3700 of 3,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] The rationale for resisting this special position was enunciated by Justice Parrett in Phillips v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
A while back, Phillip Carter noticed that the damage run-amok contractors do to Iraqis is also damage to the U.S. mission.What, if anything, can the law do? [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Mark Zamora
PHILLIPS, District Judge.This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8]. [read post]