Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 27,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Thirdly, Parliament did not intend the 2002 Act to provide a comprehensive code for dealing with repeat claims or for rule 353 no longer to be effective. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
Pim v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Puntenney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
State Personnel Bd. (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1169, 1175.) [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Lewis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
As I’ve explained previously, the state’s criminal code establishes two distinct types of grand juries: regular grand juries and special purpose grand juries. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm
The Treasury issued a Revenue Ruling today that sets out the rules that will guide the government in handling interpretation of the tax code regarding "marriage" and "husband" or "wife" or "spouse" in respect of same-sex married couples after the Supreme Court's historic DOMA decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:52 pm
On Tuesday, CAAF remanded United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 5:05 pm
Mixon v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 6:06 am
However, the insured’s pledge of the policy proceeds may give a creditor rights superior to the named beneficiary’s according to the 1968, Texas Supreme Court opinion, McAllen State Bank v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 11:16 am
People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
For those interested in the quotation of Daniel Webster above, see State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
The order in Valeant v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
He argued that compelling him to disclose his text messages would violate the state and federal constitutions and was prohibited by state and federal statutes. . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
(See Estate of Linderme v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
(See Estate of Linderme v. [read post]
