Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 8,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 6:48 am
" The Circuit cites Adams v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
This past Term's Lozman v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:22 pm
Fouse v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:55 pm
Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:56 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has, most recently in Utah v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm
In Alabama, there is no state law protection from being terminated because Alabama is an “at will” employment state. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:29 am
In the past, such efforts have been subject to an equal protection analysis that allows race-conscious or sex-conscious state action, contingent on existing, de facto inequality. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:25 am
The adoption of SB 1137 affirms the District Court’s ruling in Lam v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:25 am
Peter Harder and Danylo Korbabicz in Lexology Campaign Finance Kansas: “House-Senate panel votes to double campaign donation limits” by Tim Carpenter in The Topeka Capital-Journal State Legislatures Florida: “State Lawmakers Pushing To Extend Legislative Terms” by Nick Evans in WFSU.org Vermont: “Off-session legislative activity causes concern” by Neal Goswami in the Times Argus Washington: “Liias, Ryu selected for leadership posts in… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:33 pm
by Jeremy Clare Even though Lance Armstrong decided on August 23rd not to proceed to arbitration with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”), the process for sanctioning Mr. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
The Kinston case, Nix v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
Moreover, the term was used in everyday parlance to denote that type of racing, predating both the establishment of the FIA Formula One World Championship and Formula One’s use of the term.The Hearing Officer held that the competing goods were identical based on the principle enunciated in Case T-133/05 Gérard Meric v OHIM, [which the IPKat couldn't find on the Curia database, searching both by name and by case number. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Last month, Judge Green of the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Crest v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
