Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 15,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court handed down its decision legalizing abortion, Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that were not… [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Incorporation has vastly expanded the Court’s authority to regulate the states, without the sanction of legislation or amendment under Article V. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:01 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
A prime example was Bush v Gore, in which the United States Supreme Court was called on to resolve an election dispute. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:59 pm
Lopez Ribalda v Spain Lopez concerned five employees who worked as cashiers at a supermarket chain. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
*Smith v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:11 pm
As we navigate the first year without the protections of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:15 am
Kahn posted the Supreme Court ruling in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:05 am
Hong, Overturning Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm
This is a great tool for studying the history of language and word usage. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am
Zerbst, and Gideon was a decision about incorporating the right and applying it to the states. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:15 pm
In our case, Alasaad v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Robin Fretwell Wilson, 'Getting the Government Out of Marriage' Post Obergefell: The Ill-Considered Consequences of Transforming the State’s Relationship to Marriage, (University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-14, March 2016).Lauren Sudeall Lucas, The Free Exercise of Religious Identity, (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2017 Forthcoming).Marc O. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
The Court’s decision in Kelo v. [read post]
