Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 7,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2019, 4:01 am
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 4:33 pm
" (Although the text of Section 14 is directed to petitions to cancel registrations, the Board held in PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
They issued just one decision, in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:44 pm
Resembling more than anything last term’s decision in DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor "enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
Mata appealed that decision to the Fifth Circuit, which held, based upon its 2008 ruling in Ramos-Bonilla v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court held that non-obvious redaction distinguished Gray and, along with a jury instruction, sufficiently protected Samia’s rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
In Krupski v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Under Sosa v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:22 am
[1] Cetaceans v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
As I said above, Bruen may well be the most anti-originalist opinion in history.The abortion decision, Dobbs v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:43 pm
Justice Thomas asked whether any case law held that a statute could be unconstitutional special legislation because it conferred a benefit that the plaintiff didn't want. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
” As law professor Joanna Schwartz explains, Hope v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am
People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:14 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
The defendants justified under certain patents to Thomas A. [read post]
