Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
However, that assumption has been upended by recent decisions by the California Court of Appeal and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California invalidating employee non-solicitation agreements. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:28 pm
A recent California Court of Appeal decision upheld the state’s complex rules for compensating piece-rate employees. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am
SEC, the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the SEC’s administrative law judges (“ALJ”) are “officers of the United States,” and thereby subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
In the United States, silicosis litigation has been infused with fraud and deception, not by the defendants, but by the litigation industry that creates lawsuits. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:27 pm
Finally, the Court’s opinion reflects a shift in attitude that underlies privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:08 am
United States Fish and Wildlife Service photo of gray wolf OR-7 According to the administrative record, gray wolves historically inhabited most of the United States, including much of California, until they were extirpated from California almost 100 years ago. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:33 am
Fred Hamilton et al – UNited States District Court – Central District of California – January 28th, 2019) involves a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
Shortly after Payments IP moved to intervene in the California Case, Payments IP filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the “Maryland Case”), asserting claims similar to those asserted by Payments IP in the California Case, including a claim for declaratory judgment regarding ownership of the Domain. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:02 pm
Dorf cited the landmark Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:38 am
Circuit’s focus on common-law principles in its recent decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
Other Notable State Cases Regarding Restrictive Covenants The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Manitowoc Company v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
United States District Court for the Central District of California Filed January 23, 2019, Case: 2:19-cv-00505 On January 23, 2019, James Baker, a.k.a. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
Epic Games, Inc. et al United States District Court for the Central District of California Filed January 11, 2019, CACD-2-19-cv-00260 Yet another person has filed a lawsuit […] [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
