Search for: "American Express Co."
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
In re American Express Merchant’s Litigation, 634 F.3d 187 (2d Cir. 2011), concluded that the costs of an economic analysis in a Sherman Act tying arrangement claim made the class waiver unenforceable. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:18 pm
He co-authors the nationally recognized Wisconsin Workers' Compensation Experts. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:22 am
Such protection is not extended to ideas or facts upon which the expression is based. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:53 pm
”I wrote five years ago that “many of [Mearsheimer and co-author Stephen Walt’s] critics are erring in accusing the authors of anti-Semitism without supporting evidence. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
In Lummus Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:05 am
He co-founded the Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project in 1999 with Professor Steve Wermiel. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
City of ArlingtonCourt: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 08-10630 September 15, 2011 Judges: Benavides, Prado Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Plaintiffs, five individuals with disabilities, alleged that defendant recently built and altered sidewalks that were not readily accessible to them and requested injunctive relief under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C.… [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:50 am
” Grunfeld also expressed skepticism that Johnston was in fact Jewish. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:04 pm
The Wall Street Journal recently expressed similar distaste for Romney's China trade plan, arguing that it could incite additional US protectionism and spark a "trade war" with one of America's biggest trading partners. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:57 pm
. ***** Technology Changing at Lightning-Fast Speeds In last week’s column, I expressed alarm regarding what I perceived to be a shift in thinking on the issue of electronic communications on the part of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Formal Opinion No. 11-459. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:59 am
Though we started the article over two years ago, I’ve seen little occur to assuage the concerns we expressed in it. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:59 am
My co-blogger Danielle Citron and I wrote about some of the consequences in an article that recently appeared in the Hastings Law Journal: In a speech at the Washington National Cathedral three days after 9/11, then-President George W. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
" Well, what's that expression? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm
" As of early this morning, the White House has posted support comments on the President's plan from: Steve Case, Chairman & CEO of Revolution LLC, Chairman of the Startup America Partnership; Mark Gallogly Co-founder and Managing Principal, Centerbridge Partners; Randi Weingarten, President, American Federation of Teachers; Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter; Ken Chenault, Chairman and CEO, American Express; Jeff… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:15 am
Mullainathan, in work co-authored with Professor Michael S. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:17 pm
Insiders say that the Justice Department did essentially nothing with the case, and when contacted by American Banker, a Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 pm
But eventually Olson sued, claiming that applying the ordinance to her was unconstitutional.Not so, the district court held:There is no doubt that the press has a unique and important role in American society, especially in politics. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
See, for example, American Bar Association Formal Opinion No. 99-413, N.Y. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
American Broadcasting Cos., 621 F.2d 57, 61 (2nd Cir. 1980): “The fair use doctrine is not a license for corporate theft, empowering a court to ignore a copyright whenever it determines the underlying work contains material of possible public importance” ; Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
