Search for: "Doe, Inc." Results 3701 - 3720 of 51,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 11:16 am by Stacy
With a hat tip to Docket Navigator for the eye–popping order in Versata Software, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:27 am
" While the order does not guarantee that Aon will win its case for a permanent injunction, it does exemplify the potential pit falls of breaching an executive employment agreement in Illinois. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm by Lewis Craft
The world of passwords for electronic devices is on the brink of extinction if Apple, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:27 pm
., Inc., the Federal Circuit considered the standards for adding an alleged co-inventor to an existing patent. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:01 am
Gotham City Registry, Inc. (06-2432-CV - Decided: January 24, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held, in a case of first impression, that an employer policy requiring prior authorization for overtime work does not relieve the employer from paying overtime absent such pre-approval.The Gotham City case involved a Petition for civil contempt brought by the United States Secretary of Labor (the "Secretary") for an alleged violation of a Consent… [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
D & M Smoked Fish, Inc., which does business as Haifa Smoked Fish, announced this week that the company was recalling specific lots of its Haifa Smoked Fish brand products due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 8:15 pm
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Federal District Court Filings and Dockets, Justia Related Web Resources: TGS-NOPEC Geophysic Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by admin
Cantella does not condone Hicks’ behavior does not feel that it was done in a malicious manner or with an intent to harm the clients, and that he showed poor judgement, FINRA notes. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by admin
Cantella does not condone Hicks’ behavior does not feel that it was done in a malicious manner or with an intent to harm the clients, and that he showed poor judgement, FINRA notes. [read post]