Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,952
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:02 am
In a two-sentence section marked “Other Information” near the bottom of page 38, Exxon Mobil disclosed: “Effective April 1, 2011, the annual salary for Michael J. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:11 am
At companies with a market capitalization of less that $1 billion, shareholders supported a biennial or triennial recommendation in 26 out of 38 instances. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Submissions must be received no later than August 1, 2011. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
However, he does assert that under its new management, the company is turning around. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:58 am
Further, Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure also does not require the issuing judicial authority to sign the search warrant when the search warrant is applied for in person. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
Does this trend reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:12 pm
Does this reflect a durable change in attitudes towards crime and punishment, or is this about short-term fiscal pressures and the need to reduce bloated corrections budgets? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1.the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;2.the nature of the copyrighted work;3.the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and4.the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.The… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If Pinnock and proportionality did apply then the Supreme Court would need to grapple with the detail of how proportionality should operate, procedurally and substantively (issues 1-4 above). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The paper originally published by the Gazette of Law and Journalism Part 1 of the paper was posted on 22 February 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Although the Act under consideration (Housing Act 1996) does not expressly empower courts to refuse an order sought ([38]), “there is nothing in…the 1996 Act which either expressly or by necessary implication prevents the court from refusing to make an order for possession if it considers it would not be proportionate to do so” ([38]) 5. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
., 83 F.3d 1394, 38 USPQ2d 1776 (Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
USDA will subsidize your premium, from 100% at the least yield and price level to 38% at the maximum coverage level. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:59 pm
§407 - Social Security benefits 38 USC. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
The data in the below tables and in the detailed chart does not include companies conducting Say-On-Pay votes that are mandated by virtue of the company's participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program and also does not include companies that voluntarily held Say-On-Pay votes (e.g., companies which held their annual shareholder meeting shortly before the January 21, 2011 effective date for Say-On-Pay but which nevertheless opted to voluntarily hold a Say-On-Pay… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:40 pm
The $90.00 personal allowance reduction is not countable as income towards Medicaid, M21-1MR, Part V, Subpart iii, Chapter 3 1. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
That the district court judge got it more right than not does not excuse the slop. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
” Id. at 1367, citing WMS Gaming, 184 F.3d at 1337-38. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
The table below suggests that where people work (or want to work) does not depend on how much they have in outstanding student loans: Amount of debtLaw firmGovernmentIn-housePublic interestOtherUnemployed or under-employedNone72%12%8%3%5%0%$1-49,99973%12%7%2%6%1%$50,000-99,99973%12%6%2%7%0%$100,000 or more70%12%5%3%6%3% Let’s look at the results another way, namely, how the amount of outstanding student loans varies by type of legal employment: Amount of debtLaw… [read post]
