Search for: "Early v. State" Results 3701 - 3720 of 16,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 10:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
" Resignation to accept other employment:  Claimant had a valid offer of employment at the time he tendered his resignation but this offer of employment was subsequently rescinded by the prospective employer after it learned of Claimant’s arrest for “driving while ability impaired” and Claimant’s former employer would not allow him to withdraw or rescind his resignation, [Matter of Bennett (Commissioner of Labor), 106 AD3d 1359].In contrast, leaving employment to… [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
Did the NAACP criticize Nifong's publicity barrage in late March/early April? [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman LLP, 110 AD3d 426), rather than granting dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 7:43 am by Belal Elrahal
Another part of the bill, Part V, authorizes a pilot program for placing and using automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) on “state rights-of-way. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  Early in this blog’s existence, in 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court in State ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
She 'wiped it off a little bit, cleaned his mouth off with a little, like a wet cloth.' Defendant stated that she 'tucked my blanket around him,' after which she fell asleep for 45 minutes or so. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
The argument in Florence also generated early commentary. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It did this under the power conferred by Rule 104(2) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 which states that the CAT may “make any order it thinks fit in relation to the payment of costs”. [read post]