Search for: "P. T.2" Results 3701 - 3720 of 14,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Sept. 10, 2009) (“[I]t would be inappropriate to consider the period of time after the alleged wrongful removal in the acclimatization analysis, as this could reward the [allegedly] abducting parent for the time during which the child was [allegedly] wrongfully retained or removed. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
– Alex Hern Big Tech Could Be Liable for Content That Isn’t Actually Illegal, If the U.K. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Session 2,  Cont’d Mark Lemley: point of TM law from producer perspective is product differentiation. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:33 am by Paula Urban
ECMO is a common treatment for babies with respiratory issues that employs a pump to circulate the baby’s blood through an artificial lung to help with oxygenation (2). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:47 pm by Bill Marler
This included residents of Arizona (4), California (5), Florida (2), Illinois (1), Massachusetts (1), Maryland (1), Missouri (1), New Jersey (1), Oregon (11), Virginia (2), Washington (2), and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I didn’t find any cases where a plaintiff actually won in court during the period; not inconsistent w/past jurisprudence, w/only 2 512(f) victories in 21 years.Joseph Gratz Durie Tangri LLP: Not that many cases since the last set of roundtables. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cost of litigation--$1500 to $3000 for a takedown, while litigation is up to $2 million. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 2 April 2019 Julian Knowles J will hear an application in the defamation case of Sadik v Sadik. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:10 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Pittsburg Post-Gazette piece portrays the sensitive handling of the juror excusal by Judge Alexander P. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:34 pm by Eric Caligiuri
  The asserted patents (1) list the same four inventors; (2) share a common specification; and (3) claim priority to the same Japanese patent application, P 09-081010, and the same U.S. [read post]