Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
K-V Pharm. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
See also El v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:11 pm
By Andrew DelaneyPcolar v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:49 pm
Electronic Arts Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
In § 1983 suits the officer’s actions are judged by a reasonableness standard “not capable of precise definition or mechanical application. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:11 pm
By Andrew DelaneyPcolar v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
Maryland Rule 8-131(c) From State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:29 am
The presentation canvassed a series of issues in the debate regarding appropriate responses, including: state v. federal responses; private ordering v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 7:29 am
The successorship standards are flexible and must be tailored to the circumstances at hand. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:45 am
At most, only a fraction of the harassing Yik Yak posts would have qualified as “true threats,” which is a high legal standard precisely because it represents an incursion into the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” Specifically, the president, “using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal entry; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
In fairness to the court of appeals, this is a known problem of using “controversial” as a standard in a lawsuit over compelled commercial speech, where there is by definition a controversy. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Yet those are precisely the things civilian review boards cannot do. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:35 pm
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:30 pm
Arista v. [read post]
