Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
-------------------*Here's Stevens, from Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir explaining how he concluded that the death penalty is now unconstitutional - a conclusion he stated in Baze v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
I wrote about that argument in my article The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine (July 29, 2003), where I explained that: In Dodge v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:59 pm
This case is Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
” People connect their hopes and dreams to specific pieces of real property, and often get very emotional when those dreams are threatened. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 am
Neil v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
(I have no one in particular in mind here, but, by way of example, in recent years a number of people seem to have argued both sides of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am
I have also enjoyed working with Bob and Tracy on some projects, including some pro bono amicus briefs in the Supreme Court (including in McConnell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
* Sams v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:36 pm
Stambler v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm
Fourth Amendment fans and foes alike are awaiting oral arguments this fall in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
It will not hurt you, and if 99 per cent of them give the music to these people, all they will have to do is to pay me. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:46 pm
The aforementioned former attorney, Pat V. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am
Whilst it welcomes many of the measures in the bill, on DNA it concluded: Our predecessor Committee accepted that the Scottish model for retention of DNA samples and profiles taken from innocent people and children is more likely to be proportionate than the measures in the Crime and Security Bill 2010. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
Lord Neuberger gave a speech at the EWI annual conference last week, focusing on the UKSC judgment Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 and the growth of an inquisitorial rather than adversarial litigation model with regard to expert witnesses. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am
Lord Neuberger gave a speech at the EWI annual conference last week, focusing on the UKSC judgment Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 and the growth of an inquisitorial rather than adversarial litigation model with regard to expert witnesses. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
When most people think of a First-to-File patent system, they would probably think it means exactly what it says (the first person to file the patent application has priority). [read post]
