Search for: "Quick v. State" Results 3701 - 3720 of 4,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
There has been much more legislative action at the state level, however, particularly in conservative states. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
In the Apple-Samsung context I wrote in a standard-essential Samsung v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
Jason BarnesFirst, a quick reminder that there are still a few spots remaining to see Jason Barnes, along with Robb Helt and Ted Brooks at the Trial Presentation Seminar in Dallas. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:00 am by Léon Dijkman
Vanni cites the Indian Supreme Court's decision in Novartis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Christopher Hill, Church Times: Opinion: Clarity needed about confession: on the ELS Working Party’s Report on the Seal of Confession, the full text of which is here. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links House of Lords: Lords private members’ bills ballot 2024,  Paul Magrath, ICLR: Changes to Neutral Citations for Family Court and Court of Protection. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
  (Solove & Richards discuss Marsh as a state action case, but (on my quick read) do not appear to explicitly discuss the free speech issue.Read Solove & RIchards! [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]